Explosive Feud: Blake Lively Confronts Perez Hilton in Legal Showdown Over Online Attacks

Explosive Feud: Blake Lively Confronts Perez Hilton in Legal Showdown Over Online Attacks

Blake Lively accuses Perez Hilton of launching a smear campaign with hundreds of online videos and slurs. Full details on the courtroom clash and what it means for digital media accountability.

Blake Lively Takes Legal Action Against Perez Hilton Over Alleged Defamation

In a high-stakes legal battle that’s drawing major media attention, actress Blake Lively has formally accused celebrity blogger Perez Hilton of participating in a coordinated online campaign to discredit her. The allegations stem from Lively’s larger legal case involving director and co-star Justin Baldoni, who she claims retaliated against her following complaints of inappropriate behavior on set.

According to court documents filed in early August 2025, Lively alleges that Hilton has posted hundreds of negative videos and social media posts targeting her over the past year—many containing personal attacks and inflammatory language. Lively’s legal team argues this was not simply opinion or commentary, but part of a deliberate effort to harm her reputation.

The Origin of the Dispute

The conflict began when Lively filed a lawsuit against Baldoni, alleging misconduct during the production of the film It Ends With Us. In her lawsuit, Lively claims that after she reported his behavior, Baldoni retaliated by engaging public relations experts and online personalities to discredit her.

As part of that case, Lively issued subpoenas to several content creators she believed may have been involved in the smear campaign. Among them was Perez Hilton, a well-known figure in the celebrity news world.

What Lively’s Legal Motion Claims

In her latest legal filing, Lively asserts that Hilton has created over 500 video posts and social media updates focused on her—nearly all of them negative. Her attorneys claim Hilton used mocking and offensive language, and that he failed to reach out for her side of the story in any of his coverage.

The filing states that Hilton’s content includes slurs and derogatory nicknames. Lively argues that this type of targeted harassment goes beyond protected speech and veers into character assassination, particularly since Hilton operates for commercial gain and does not adhere to recognized journalistic practices.

Her legal team also emphasized that Hilton’s website features an entire subpage dedicated to her name, suggesting an intent to profit from persistent negative coverage.

Perez Hilton Responds

Hilton, who was served with a subpoena by Lively’s team in July 2025, responded by filing a motion for a protective order. In his filing, Hilton claimed he is a journalist and content creator who is simply expressing his opinions based on public court documents. He denied any coordination with Baldoni or his representatives and stated that he has not received payment or direction from any party in the legal case.

Hilton asked the court to block Lively from issuing further subpoenas without judicial approval. He also objected to handing over what he described as private communications and unpublished materials.

Lively Rejects the Journalist Defense

Lively’s attorneys rejected Hilton’s claim that he is acting as a journalist. The legal team argued that Hilton does not follow the ethical standards of journalism, including seeking comment before publication or providing balanced analysis. They also noted that Hilton appears to prioritize sensational headlines and viral content over factual reporting, making him a media entertainer rather than a journalist in the legal sense.

According to Lively’s filing, Hilton has not complied with the subpoena or provided any relevant communication records related to Baldoni. Her team has urged the court to deny his request for a protective order and compel him to produce the documents within seven days.

Why This Case Matters

This courtroom confrontation is about more than just celebrity drama. It raises important questions about accountability for online commentary, the role of influencers in legal conflicts, and how digital platforms are used to shape public opinion.

If the court rules in favor of Lively, it could set new boundaries on how content creators and media figures discuss public figures—particularly in sensitive legal matters. The outcome could also influence how defamation and online harassment are interpreted in future cases involving digital platforms.

Blake Lively’s legal action against Perez Hilton signals a broader shift in how celebrities respond to online attacks. With the rise of influencer-driven media and viral commentary, public figures are increasingly turning to the courts to protect their reputations.

Whether the court sees Hilton’s actions as protected opinion or targeted defamation remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the line between content creation and character assault is being closely examined in this high-profile legal dispute.

Blake Lively, Perez Hilton, Justin Baldoni, Celebrity Legal News, Online Defamation, Social Media Law, Hollywood Lawsuit, Influencer Accountability, Celebrity Reputation, Digital Harassment